|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Jun 8, 2005 19:33:21 GMT 7
larger diameter PVC....on Yok D, although the same PVC it may jack 'the 'looks' up a bit. Can try on ready to dispose racing tyre (instead of those xp Yok D), what u say professr M?  i dun see a need to do this... probably dun hav smaller size pvc ;D |
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jun 8, 2005 20:27:14 GMT 7
ooh but you soon will my dear professr, i promise you....
after i show you what i did....-secret-secret-wink-wink- ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Jun 8, 2005 21:27:48 GMT 7
smell somethin is cooking... bring it on!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jun 9, 2005 7:53:31 GMT 7
we've used stiff tyre (PVC)
do you think 'stiff but slightly softer tyre' would have certain advantage?
|
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Jun 9, 2005 8:15:28 GMT 7
wah now we have inserts for PVC!!!... maybe will be better for the front... might have more bite... like tat need a thinner and slightly larger diameter PVC???
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jun 9, 2005 8:31:19 GMT 7
and jack the car up abit to get more realistic looks?
|
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Jun 9, 2005 8:35:25 GMT 7
doubt so... its still pvc gray... not abs black  anyway by doin tat u need to have bigger wheel arc... if u hav and need to test, i hav the integra shell tat can use... remember the "RALLY TL01" integra tat chase all the buggies!!! FU WAH!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jun 9, 2005 8:42:31 GMT 7
still better looking than only PVC on rims mah?
Larger dia tyre may require slightly higher gearing to break traction but..
Anyway, i would try to get 'All Blacks' look ... stay tuned -wink-wink-
|
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Jun 9, 2005 8:47:11 GMT 7
ooh...
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jun 9, 2005 8:48:58 GMT 7
aahhh...
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jun 22, 2005 9:00:31 GMT 7
found the source of my spool play.....badly worn dogbone pin. arrgh.
still thinking whether to change the univs to cvds....getting heavy for an old car.
Anyway, my camber is out so it's back to my 'Hara' setup board heheh
|
|
retro
New Drifter
Posts: 14
|
Post by retro on Jun 22, 2005 21:46:08 GMT 7
woooooo that is cool...... but..... is there chassis for
TT-01?
|
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Jun 23, 2005 7:46:50 GMT 7
found the source of my spool play.....badly worn dogbone pin. arrgh. still thinking whether to change the univs to cvds....getting heavy for an old car. Anyway, my camber is out so it's back to my 'Hara' setup board heheh haha... mayb should use back ur hpi... set the car properly lah.. see my car so nice and easy to drive oops drift right... now need to make sure my pro 2 does the same as the 04... |
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Jun 23, 2005 7:47:24 GMT 7
woooooo that is cool...... but..... is there chassis for TT-01? wat do u mean? |
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jun 23, 2005 8:50:59 GMT 7
apart from the dogbone pin which is replaceable, i will do proper setup for my 04Pro. From most of JP website, their 04 have extra weight at the bumper. I suppose this to hold steering at high speed...mine don't steer well at hi speed, well anyway gotta fix the setup first.
Will go for super neutral suspension, bit of camber and less rear toe in.
|
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Jun 23, 2005 12:20:17 GMT 7
tats a gd idea... get the base setup first... add weights later... anyway we dun hav high speed corners...
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jun 23, 2005 14:41:17 GMT 7
Okie dok
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Jul 27, 2005 8:53:45 GMT 7
TC3 v2 chassis setup:
shocks oil: 50wt FR
shock springs: gold F, silver R
spacers: 1mm F, 2mm R
mounting: top outer most-bottom inner FR
ride height: 5mm F, 5.5mm R
droop: 2mm FR
camber: -1 FR
rear block kickup toe: 2+0
front toe in: 0
motor: Novak BL unlimited mod+R
gearing: 8.9
servo: 9550
shell: RSX with stock wing
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Aug 4, 2005 13:49:50 GMT 7
Setup change:
TC3 v2 chassis setup:
shocks oil: 50wt FR
shock springs: FR Kawada Ultra Hard
spacers: FR 4mm
mounting: top outer most-bottom inner FR
ride height: 5.5mm F, 6mm R
droop: 2mm FR
camber: -1 FR
rear block kickup toe: 2+0
front toe in: 0
front oneway: yes
motor: Novak BL unlimited mod+R
gearing: 9.2
servo: 9550
shell: RSX with stock wing
note: minimum PVC wear, slight under steer but smooth large cornering, brake at apex
|
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Sept 28, 2005 8:04:23 GMT 7
ran the tc4 yesterday... stock setup, changes are the droop settings(pvc too thin haha), using front one ways... not bad, but not there yet... not like my current pro2 setup... but throttle response is much better, guess my pro2 belt is givin way ;D
anyway my current pro2 setup is as follows:
Front
40wt oil
Tamiya Gray Springs(One step harder than white)
0.5 deg toe out
-0.5 camber
Front Diff locked(epoxy front way)
Rear
40wt
Tamiya White Springs
1 deg toe in
Motor: 23T Geared at 7.5 for torque
Will post the setup sheet if i got the time...
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Oct 5, 2005 12:43:27 GMT 7
TC3 v2 chassis setup:
shocks oil: 40wt FR
shock springs: Tamiya Blue FR
spacers: none, change to threaded
mounting: top outer most-bottom inner FR
ride height: 5,5mm FR
droop: 1.5mm FR
camber: -0.5 FR
rear block kickup toe: 2+0
front toe in: 0
front oneway for conservative smooth n tight drifting
rear tight ball diff
motor: Novak BL unlimited mod+R
gearing: 8.9 for small track, low end more linear control
servo: 9550
shell: ProLine BMW M3 with stock wing
|
|
|
|
Post by lost on Oct 5, 2005 22:25:22 GMT 7
hmm ... may i know the effects of negative camber for the front ?
|
|
|
|
Post by RowdyRowdyPiper on Oct 6, 2005 7:56:53 GMT 7
hmm ... may i know the effects of negative camber for the front ? it affects the contact patch of the tires during cornering... for front a lot of factors... such as roll center, caster etc. basically we try to achieve an even tire wear... |
|
|
|
Post by lost on Oct 6, 2005 13:25:21 GMT 7
hmm ... so the outcome is tat t he pvc wud be abit like a cone shape rite ?
like tat have to sort of wait to season the pvc and let it seat in lor ?
and the motive is to also achieve more traction and thus control on pvc?
paisei ah .. curious bout settings..
thankz !
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Oct 7, 2005 8:09:32 GMT 7
0 caster + 0 camber = minimum push + maximum spin tendency ... good for tight corner but lame on big sweeper. Maybe FR lock can compensate, nt entirely sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Izdiamond on Oct 23, 2005 15:11:22 GMT 7
Finally manage to transfer all my electronics from the tt-01 to the tc3... Had quite a few problems along the way....lol Haven't quite fully tested the tc3...seems to be in good condition..... Question.... can't seems to fit my silver can on the motor cam....i had to use my tamiya super stock tz.........is it only for brushtype motor or is there any other silver can that can fit....  ?? |
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Oct 23, 2005 15:39:48 GMT 7
not sure abt that, cos in the long history of TC3 i've never come across silvercan setup for TC3. Check again the length of the motor, possible won't fit as well. If so then forget abt the silvercan, goto next level, run your TZ.
|
|
|
|
Post by Izdiamond on Oct 23, 2005 20:55:22 GMT 7
lol....lenght wise is no problem.....just the motor cam won't fit in......
Tz motor....not bad....quite fast....seems that i have to re-adjust my driving style.... ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Oct 23, 2005 21:50:54 GMT 7
faster car
faster servo
faster motor
faster esc?
faster radio?
faster driver?
|
|
|
|
Post by GTO on Oct 23, 2005 21:52:19 GMT 7
some silvercan has bigger bushing housing compare to normal 23T stock motor etc.
Don't force the cam in..
|
|
anyway by doin tat u need to have bigger wheel arc... if u hav and need to test, i hav the integra shell tat can use... remember the "RALLY TL01" integra tat chase all the buggies!!! FU WAH!!! 
