|
|
Post by Bryant on Apr 26, 2005 21:32:49 GMT 7
Disable Signature Images:
Disable Signature Usage for a Specific Member or All Members who Signature Images too big or more then one?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bryant on Apr 26, 2005 22:14:56 GMT 7
Signature Images Sizes
Pls Keep 1 Signature Images only within the size of 600 x 300 pixels.
|
|
|
|
Post by Izdiamond on Apr 27, 2005 10:53:06 GMT 7
This issue has been around for quite sometimes...not only on this forum...but on other forums as well.... Sure....a personalize sig would be nice...but not to the extend that it occupies too much space or juz slows down opening of pages...That is why most forums have rules and regulation on the size of the sig..... Hope every member can spare a little thought...   |
|
|
|
Post by canshot on Apr 27, 2005 20:50:15 GMT 7
well i agreez.. restrictin the sign. imagez would be gd.. (lol.. itz just perhapz cuz i haven get to upload mine just yet  ) |
|
|
|
Post by Bryant on Apr 27, 2005 21:59:02 GMT 7
Signature Images Sizes Pls Keep 1 Signature Images only within the size of 600 x 300 pixels. Do you all think 600 x 300 pixels is ok or too big? |
|
|
|
Post by canshot on Apr 27, 2005 22:28:05 GMT 7
lol i fergot how big That is.. but if im not wrng.. the image im gettin in ma mine.. a bit too big le.. hmmm |
|
|
|
Post by canshot on Apr 27, 2005 23:07:11 GMT 7
perhapz 400 x 300 might be gd.. or just a lil slightly bigger.. *commentz* ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Izdiamond on Apr 28, 2005 7:12:28 GMT 7
I reccommend 600 x 200....that way it will be longish vertically and not bulk up horizontally.... Juz an opinion....  |
|
|
|
Post by somebody on May 13, 2005 15:06:04 GMT 7
hmmz...long is no a problem...but tall den jia lat liao..
|
|
|
|
Post by Geoffb on May 13, 2005 17:10:30 GMT 7
500x150 no bigger than 50kb. Thats quick too download and doesn't take up alot of space.
|
|
leftyg3
New Drifter
skeet, skeet, skeet!!
Posts: 71
|
Post by leftyg3 on Jan 18, 2006 17:32:38 GMT 7
how do you put an image in your signature anyway? i tried putting it with html, but it doent work right, all i get i a link., oh and yes 500x150 i think its good
|
|
|
|
Post by QuantumBoy on Dec 10, 2006 20:02:53 GMT 7
hmmm, will big size really affects the speed of loading that much?
|
|
|
|
Post by NoSurprises™ on Dec 10, 2006 20:05:25 GMT 7
hmmm, will big size really affects the speed of loading that much? definately... for people who still using modem... it will... depends on how big the file size as well... |
|
|
|
Post by NoSurprises™ on Dec 10, 2006 20:07:21 GMT 7
Disable Signature Images: Disable Signature Usage for a Specific Member or All Members who Signature Images too big or more then one? Must elaborate more on Specific Member... if not other drifters might not be happy abt... |
|
|
|
Post by E3lipse on Dec 10, 2006 20:29:33 GMT 7
yes
eats up bandwidth
|
|
|
|
Post by *team trixie™ | X on Dec 10, 2006 21:19:47 GMT 7
hmm.. i think its unfair to go merely by space taken or amt, cos seriously, the format of the signatures make a difference as well. i rather go by the size of the image file itself like (how many kb).
|
|
|
|
Post by E3lipse on Dec 10, 2006 21:25:55 GMT 7
Hmmm ximen, from other forums i use,
they have a image file size + lengthxbreath restriction,
This forum currently has a space restriction.
1. It makes scrolling down a whole page faster.
2. Loading time faster.
|
|
|
|
Post by dan on Dec 10, 2006 21:27:41 GMT 7
i think a 400/500 X 100 sig will be more than enuff for most ppl... file size not exceeding 70kb...
|
|
|
|
Post by E3lipse on Dec 10, 2006 21:42:34 GMT 7
i think a 400/500 X 100 sig will be more than enuff for most ppl... file size not exceeding 70kb... Haha if 100, your own sig exceed liao 500x200 is good. |
|
)
